Thinking in terms of the writing process on this one.
Yesterday I went to the corner coffee shop to do a bit of editing, a bit of outlining and some writing. The editing was for one of the guest blog pieces I mentioned earlier, due this weekend. Wednesday evening, I wrote out the rough draft, and as I wrote, I finally got to the message I wanted to convey. It didn't start until the third page, but it was there, and it's highly unlikely from that point to the end that I will edit at all.
As I worked on rewriting the first third of the piece, I had a sudden realization that writing fiction and writing nonfiction should essentially be the same type of process: just write. Sit down, pen on paper, and just start writing.
But that isn't so. I marveled at the realization that in fiction, I struggle to get started. I will find almost anything to do before writing: dishes, take a shower, call my mother..practically any excuse to start. With nonfiction, I grab a pen, the portfolio, and launch into my writing, knowing that I'll probably draft a little, revise a little and work in better words and phrases.
It comes down to this: I start nonfiction knowing and expecting I'll draft, but start fiction with the need for perfection, which keeps me from starting at all many times.
Completely insane.
Do you have this problem? If so, how have you worked on it? It's very interesting to me, especially with the belief that if I can approach fiction with my nonfiction mindset, I might actually get somewhere....
Friday, July 11, 2008
If fiction were nonfiction....
Posted by Beth at Friday, July 11, 2008
Thursday, July 10, 2008
Love Tarot? Check out this contest!
I've been raving to my writing girls about an online course I'm taking which integrates tarot reading with plotting via the Hero's Journey. I was a bit wary because I have ZERO tarot experience (except for being fascinated by it), and, well, let's just say my plotting stamina has something to be desired.
The course has been an absolute godsend. I have never in my life plotted more deeply into a book than I have, and we're only halfway through (but I digress).
Key to my understanding has been the excellent teacher, Stephanie Arwen Lynch. So imagine my surprise when I found out she's going to be not only chatting on a radio show about the Tarot (she *is* the current president of the American Tarot Association), but also hosting a contest for a free reading....:) I'm posting here to get myself into the drawing (definitely check out her blog if you're even remotely interested. Really fab stuff she's got going on!). You won't be sorry....
Let's Talk Tarot & Readings
Do you want to learn more about Tarot? Want to listen in as a professional Tarot consultant gives free readings? Want to be one of the people who gets a reading? Come join Stephanie Arwen Lynch, president of the American Tarot Association and professional Tarot consultant, as she chats with authors Mandy M Roth and Michelle Pillow Wednesday July 16th from 11pm to 12 midnight EST.
And you can win a free reading by posting this notice somewhere it hasn't been posted and leaving the link here. Have to leave it there or it doesn't count.
Posted by Beth at Thursday, July 10, 2008
Labels:
contest
Tuesday, July 08, 2008
Busier than A-Rod's attorney
Sorry for the sports reference but my brain is almost mush at this point. What a busy day.
Not complaining--this is part of the reason writing is so much fun. Started the day by sending out the interview/questionnaire requests, then moved on to checking email, only to find I've been asked to guest blog in two new places (how cool is that?!) (details after they're hashed out). Had a morning meeting then a one o'clock phone interview. Yeah, the one I was dreading. Not out of fear but unfamiliarity. I've never talked with a PR person before (in terms of an article), but I had nothing to worry about.
It was a blast! I learned some absolutely fascinating health stuff that will not only flesh out this article (due next week), but gave me some GREAT ideas for a query or two to some big-name markets...ones I've been trying to get into for quite some time. Fingers crossed...
From there, I sent out more questionnaires, worked on a column and played with a few blog widgets. With dinner came another amazing query idea I'm itching to send out to the same big-namers above. Maybe I'll save that one so that when the rejection comes from the first, I can whip out another fab idea. Did some camp planning (soooo close to camp....), and am about to settle in and crank out a minimum three pages on the fiction WIP. I'm also taking part in my local RWA chapter's Power Draft this week, in which I pledged to finish chapter one of the fiction WIP. I'm 1/3 done, so I've got work to do.
Amazingly, I'm not tired yet, and I've been up since 6. Must be that good writing karma.....
Posted by Beth at Tuesday, July 08, 2008
Romance Authors are the BEST
...and not just because I am one!
I posted the call for authors this morning here, on my blog, and to three author loops to which I belong. A couple of great ladies passed it on via Twitter and other loops, and as of right now, I've sent out 53 questionnaires. Absolutely fabulous. I've always known romance writers are the best and this just confirms it.
Even better--the responses are completely awesome. I really am so psyched for this article. What's interesting is how the whole idea came about. I'll share that in an upcoming post.
If you're published and just stopping by at the request of a friend and wonder if I can use your insight--absolutely. Please drop me a line at: beth@bethmorrow and I'll be glad to send you the questionnaire. More sources mean a stronger article and more insight, so come on! Tell me what makes your sub-genre the best!
Posted by Beth at Tuesday, July 08, 2008
Wanted: Published Romance Authors
If you're a published romance writer and want a little free promo, I've got a deal for you!
I'm working on an article for the October '08 issue of the RWR (topic: sub-genres of romance) and need author interviews to round out the piece.
If you're interested, (the questionnaire is only five questions long and I need it no later than July 20th), drop me an email at: beth@bethmorrow.com or blog@bethmorrow.com and we can chat.
Do feel free to pass this on to any romance-writing friends who might be interested.
Thanks a bunch! Now back to the writing....
Posted by Beth at Tuesday, July 08, 2008
Monday, July 07, 2008
My kingdom for a pen....
I'm a ink-pen addict. I make no bones about it. I can't write unless I have the right pen.
98% of the time I'm a fountain pen girl. None of these new-fangled ink pens that stutter and leave blotches. I need the good, solid heft of a real pen to write, especially fiction, which I draft longhand first.
The other 2% of the time, I'm testing out new pens. I buy pens like most women buy shoes. Anything new, shiny, sparkly or with a pretty color suckers me in immediately. The guys at Staples (near where I used to work and now near my house) all know me by first name. If I have a bad day at school, I don't drink to forget my problems (well, ok, I do ...), I stop by the pen aisle on the way home and pick up something cool.
My latest trial-and-error is a success. For years, the only pen the hubby would use to grade lab notebooks and chemistry quizzes was the Pilot extra-fine. (In red, of course). A few weeks ago, I discovered the Pilot Precise v5 RT (extra fine as well)--in a retractable, not capped, form. I got a package (for him, I claimed) for fun.
I love this pen!! It's smooth and doesn't skip, drip or smear. (I'm a fast writer). I love the extra fine tip for scribbling extra notes to myself in the margins (or between lines) for future drafts. I'm not going to leave the fountain pens anytime soon, but this is a definite keeper.
(It takes so very little to excite me sometimes it's almost scary, but if you write longhand, you understand my happiness :))
When you write, which pen is your favorite? Tell me about it. Remember, every post gets you entered in the July 23 drawing by Jason, the boy genius. (a hint: he hates writing with pens. Pencils only. Maybe he's adopted...)
(and maybe an extra point if you can tell me from whom I filched the post title from...)
Posted by Beth at Monday, July 07, 2008
Oooh, Goody! A Contest!
Yeah, it's been a while. I've been cruising around my favorite blogs and realized I haven't done much to reward you loyal readers (and lord knows, you need a reason to read this drivel!)
For the next three (or so) weeks, I'm gonna host a contest. Lucky for you, there's no writing to this one. Every comment you post will constitute an entry, and on July 23rd, I'll have Jason, the boy genius, pick his favorite for a nice little summer door prize. Don't start looking into vacay properties just yet--there's no cash involved. (I am a struggling writer just like you!). But I do have a nice assortment of writing toys for your pleasure, maybe a craft book or two. I'll see what I can dig up and will post that list later.
In the meantime, I'm on my way to a post about my newest (simpleminded) discovery: pens. Try not to have too much fun with that one....
Posted by Beth at Monday, July 07, 2008
Labels:
contest
Thursday, July 03, 2008
Goals with the Girls
Just back from a nice gab session at Panera's with the Serious Writer girls. Every three weeks, we all meet and congratulate, commiserate and cogitate on our writing and writing process.
It never, ever, ever (did I say "ever?") fails that I come home ready and raring to write from these coffeeshop gatherings. Whether it's a renewed focus on my fiction or a new attitude toward my articles, the SW girls always get me moving (and it's not just the threat of owing $5 in three weeks for lack of meeting the goal.)
Here are my next goals. This will be a busy three-week period, because the 25th-August 2nd I'll be away on vacation (working at summer camp--better than any vacation anywhere), and there's no time to mess up.
1) Finish chapter one in the new fiction work (untitled as of yet)
2) Submit romance genre article on July 24th (not due til Aug. 3 but I don't think my brain will be back in writing mode after camp)
3) Submit article editor requested today (yay!) for diabetes magazine (due the 17th, would like to turn it in by the 15th)
I think that's good enough. Not to mention I'm still taking the plotting-your-novel-using-the-Tarot online workshop (SOOOoooo much fun!), so I have to keep up with that as well. Suddenly, my summer went from slow to slow down in just a day. I like it that way :)
What about you? What about your writing goals for the next three weeks? And how will you reward yourself? I'd love to hear!
Posted by Beth at Thursday, July 03, 2008
Monday, June 30, 2008
Writing Karma, part 2
I just spent a few minutes trying to find the post where I'd mentioned how I swear some writing topics & ideas are synergistic, meaning several people write about them in a close timeframe. It's happened to me before, and it's just happened to me again. (I can't find the post but I'm going to bore you with my story anyway!)
Maybe this one wasn't karmic in nature. I like to think it was my intellect as a writer coming to the surface before someone else (whom I admire) wrote a similar article.
I'm a huge, huge fan of Chris Bibey's Freelance Writing blog, so imagine my surprise when I hopped over for a dose and found a post (almost eerily) similar to a two-article series I just finished for the Writer2Writer.com ezine this month. Same topic, same advice (though mine spans two columns). Wild!
Check it out for yourself and tell me how crazy this is:
My articles, from May and June:
4 Ways to Get Freelance Writing Jobs, Part 1: Online Jobs
4 Ways to Get Freelance Writing Jobs, Part 2: Real-Life Jobs
and Chris' post today:
How to Find More Freelance Writing Clients Next Month
Tell me that's not a little bit funky!
I just hope no one is working on a novel with my unique theme...
Posted by Beth at Monday, June 30, 2008
The ugly baby's been put to sleep
...and thank god, none too soon.
I actually re-read the story (not my usual M.O. in reviewing books) to see exactly what it was that I didn't like so much. I discovered, aside from the crappy editing (for example, the hero asks a question, the heroine has three lines of internal thought, then a one-word response in quotation marks attached to the end of her thought...ack!!), I was disappointed that the author failed to deliver the premise.
The story started strong and romantic, but a few pages in, we get zinged with a gratuitous (and vivid/graphic) sex thought by the heroine--in the MIDDLE of a fight scene between the hero and her (bully) friend. Nothing the heroine had said, thought or done up to this point in the book was remotely graphic/erotic. Sensual, yes. But I swear (and didn't write, though I wanted to), that it was as if the graphic thoughts were randomly inserted as if to make this story salable as an erotica.
Shame, too. Had such potential as a simple romance. Ah, well. I just signed up for three more books to review. One contemporary and two paranormal time travels. I'm hoping the ugly baby was the only one of the summer and that the rest of the reviews are smooth sailing.
Posted by Beth at Monday, June 30, 2008
Sunday, June 29, 2008
As if one of me weren't enough...
So what if it's true I just squandered away the last half-hour playing online? I found the funnest place to mess around in a long time.
Doesn't hurt that it's related to the best show known to mankind...aka the Simpsons.
Here's the rub: upload a photo of yourself and it'll Simpsonize you. I think it's a little dark for me, but it's still cute...
Simpsonize yourself at: http://simpsonizeme.com/
Posted by Beth at Sunday, June 29, 2008
How Did I End Up On the Cover...
This is entirely too funny. Someone is too creative for their own good!
(Yeah, so it's from 2006. Still funny)
How Did I End Up on the Cover of this Romance Novel?
Posted by Beth at Sunday, June 29, 2008
Friday, June 27, 2008
Fiction hates me.
The best part of being a fiction writer is discovering the story.
The worst part of being a fiction writer is discovering the story requires you to tell the story in ways you try to avoid because they scare you.
The current WIP was initially a very short story idea--no more than 20 pages. However, as I've played with it, it's gotten bigger. Part of the appeal of the short short to me is that novel-length still scares me a little. I mean, try writing six of them and getting nowhere. After a while, and success at a shorter length, it makes sense to stick with what's working.
Oh, but no. I had to get this idea, had to start working on it and figure out where it's going. I get bits and pieces at a time, and that keeps me happy and writing. But once I figured out the hero's main problem, there was a slight possibility that his current problem (which stems from a past tragedy) could trigger a mushroom cloud of emotion, requiring a deeper, more complex story line than I could possibly cover in twenty pages.
I gave up on the 20 pages thing before I started to write. Novella, I convinced myself, and continued plotting, blissfully happy that I could manage the length with the story I had.
My walk & plot session on Friday, however, turned the tables on me. Damned if I didn't know from the start that his emotional plot line is going to require his past tragedy on center stage. Over an hour of walking and plotting, and only one conclusion: the story can't be the story without his action today to overcome the tragedy of yesterday.
Oh, well. I've plotted a novel (or six) before, I can do it again. I just wish I didn't hear that sarcastic laughter in the back of my head saying....I told you so....
Posted by Beth at Friday, June 27, 2008
Wednesday, June 25, 2008
Past my bedtime
I put off the ugly baby review for another day. Just can't get the gumption to write something I don't want to write.
But I have been working today. I judged two contest entries for my local RWA chapter as a discrepancy judge. One was ....not an ugly baby but.... and the other was almost perfect. Loved the story, the style and the premise. Not to mention the h/h tension. I think I'll be reading that as a published novel some day....
I've also been plotting the current WIP. I'm taking a different route on this one: tarot cards. Yeah, I know--I know nothing about them other than they're pretty. But I'm taking an online course by a very talented Tarot reader & novelist who is one of the best online instructors I've had. I've been toying with my hero's issues over the past few days, and tonight when I drew his Call to Action card, things started to fall into place. An English professor who hates the classics and finds myth overrated...that's the tortured soul I've been hearing about!
I also got a nice bit of news earlier this evening. An online article I wrote for a diabetes magazine was selected for the print version, due out in July or August. Just gotta get 'em a bio and photo. My favorite part of the writing process...
Off to draw a card for my heroine's Call to Action. I could do this all night...well, if I knew anything else about Tarot cards, I could...lol
Posted by Beth at Wednesday, June 25, 2008
Tuesday, June 24, 2008
How do you say....ugly baby?
Actually, this was going to be my pre-Martha Beck post but I tend to get a little excited when I find real-life stuff that relates to writing.
This post is all writing-related.
I've been reading a book for a review. I used to do a lot of reviewing but cut back about a year ago. This one's a fiction title I'm doing for a review site I work with. I was intrigued by the premise, so I took it off the shelf. It's an erotica, which I don't mind reviewing, just have to post under the pen name. It's a novella, so it was a quick (one-night) read.
And that's about the only good stuff I can say about it.
Don't get me wrong. It's not the sub-genre. I've read some fan-tabulous erotica authors (Angela Knight, JC Wilder, Rosemary Laurey come to mind, for starters). It's the book itself. It comes from a great, popular publisher that I've read tons of stuff from, and almost always like. As I mentioned, I LOVED the premise.
But the story sucked.
I couldn't bring myself to care about the characters. All the heroine did was sob about her ex (boyfriend, husband. I forget) and feel sorry for herself. While that happens in life, if it happens in fiction, it should be a spoonful with a purpose, not a cup full to be dumped. As for the hero, I was told repeatedly how sexy he was, and occasionally shown how sexy he was (although any character younger than my 29 year-old brother doesn't qualify as "sexy", he qualifies as "a kid"). He didn't come across as true male because of a few of his actions, but that was a minor offense.
The story goes along nicely, if blandly. The heroine is a simple lady, not a sensual thought in her head. But when the hero is introduced, it's like Mrs. Jekyll and Hyde. Stuff happens to the heroine that literally shocked me out of the story. Not what happened--I can handle that. More of how out-of-character-for-the-character-I'd-just-been-reading it was.
Think: Miss Beadle in "Little House on the Prairie" (the first teacher) turns into Catherine Tramell (Sharon Stone's alter-ego in "Basic Instinct")..then back again.
Freaky, huh? That's a pretty good assessment. (I know. Take a little time to think that one over...LOL). Over and over and over. Just s*x for the sake of s*x, not the sake of furthering plot or character.
Well, that was my reading night. To make matters worse, the book was HORRIBLY (or, quite possibly, not at all) edited. Tense shifts, point of view changes, the hero internalizing thoughts the heroine should have had...it took everything in me not to pull out the red pen and edit the damn thing as I read.
At the end, I was so disheartened. I loved the premise. Still do. But the quality of writing, the depth of emotion, the story delivery fell so short I feel like I completely wasted those hours of my life and should demand a refund.
The worst part about this is that I still have to write a review. Mind you, I've written not-so-favorable reviews before (only one that I actually recall). I completely document the reasons why, because I don't believe writers should be criticized (their stories, anyway) without solid proof, but I also don't believe people should spend money on a story that is more of a brainstorming session without structure.
Since getting my own story published, I've developed an extra sensitivity to the whole review process. Waiting for those first reviews can make you want to throw up. (at least me). I don't want to make anyone feel bad about their work, but this one is truly worse than the bag of forgotten lettuce I found in the back of the fridge last week.
Stories are our babies. We fuss and play with them for weeks or months in our minds before we let them into the world. Who wants to hear they have an ugly baby? I'm going to need extra help with this one...
Posted by Beth at Tuesday, June 24, 2008
10% More...
I went to a meeting this morning and the speaker presented an interesting thought (this was on the topic of losing weight, but I'm always thinking writing):
What if you did just 10% more in addition to what you're already doing? How would that change your results?
Pretty easy in terms of weight loss. I walk an hour a day and do about 20 minutes of weightlifting a day, of some sort, so those numbers are simple.
But what about writing? If it were you, how would that translate? Here are some thoughts: (bear with me if the math is off. We all know I truly suck. I'm trying hard LOL)
--one additional query for each ten you send out
--ten additional minutes of brainstorming or writing for every hour that you spend
--five additional pages edited for every 50 (or however many you may edit at a time)
--one more reprint market approached for every ten
I kept it simple, mostly because to do percents, I have to keep the numbers small (lol), but I really am thinking of how 10% more (per day) spent on my writing would be the most well-spent. So many possibilities.
How about you? If you chose to give 10% more to your writing, where would you add it and why? I'd love to hear....
Posted by Beth at Tuesday, June 24, 2008
Oprah Mag II: Martha's Article
I suppose if I were a good blogger, I'd have done this first...lol.
Stopped by Oprah's site and found the text link to Martha's article on regret:
Who's Sorry Now? by Martha Beck
Page 2 has the particular section I mention below. See if it doesn't make you think a bit differently about your character emotions....
Posted by Beth at Tuesday, June 24, 2008
Oprah Magazine and the Art of Character Development
I'm a huge fan of life coaches, especially Cheryl Richardson and Martha Beck. I don't think I've ever heard anything from either of these ladies that didn't make sense to some part of my life.
In the July issue of Oprah Magazine, Martha's "Advice, etc." column shows that she's not only a very funny writer (which you can pick up by reading her books as well), she's got some serious insight into human emotions, most notably in this article, regret.
I wasn't reading for any particular reason other than I like her stuff, but when I got to the second step, "Separate regret's basic ingredients", it struck me that this isn't only a blueprint of human emotion, it's also one of our fictional characters' emotions.
That second step alone is worth its weight in gold when it comes to figuring out what our characters are feeling. Rather than lump "anger" or "happiness" or "remorse" into a one-word description in our stories, we'd be far better served (and get to the heart and meat of the character, which in turn deepens the reader's reaction and emotional engagement) to figure out what elements go into that emotion for that character at that point in time. Not only will it add depth to the story and character, it might even lend itself to a few scenes or a future action that can highlight the problem (remember, show, don't tell).
If your character is angry, why is she angry? It isn't enough to know she's angry because someone backed into her new car. One character might be angry because the car represents her life savings and now she has to find a way to pay for repairs. Another might be angry because the person who backed into her was driving drunk, and her brother was killed by a drunk driver. (ooooh, backstory and emotion. Like that!). A third might be angry because the accident is making her late for the most important court date of her lawyer career. And a fourth might be mad because he was borrowing the car from dad...without mentioning it to dad that he was leaving. Four characters, four stories, four drastically different points of view...from one emotion.
Read the article for a more in-depth presentation of what I'm trying to summarize. What it really comes down is.....Get to the root of your problem and infuse your stories with the detail you discover. Your readers will thank you for it.
Posted by Beth at Tuesday, June 24, 2008
Sunday, June 22, 2008
Be a writer, not a wimp
Yesterday while awaiting the start of my yoga class, I overheard a conversation between two older women I didn't know, but, judged on their interaction, must have known each other. Here's the gist:
Lady 1: "Wow, it's been so long since I've seen you. What are you up to?"
Lady 2: "Not much. After class, I've got a meeting with my writing group."
Lady 1: "I didn't know you were a writer. What do you write?"
Lady 2: "Oh, well, um, I, you know, well. I wrote one poem about six years ago and it was published."
Lady 1: "Neat. So what do you do with your writing group?"
Lady 2: "Well, we write stuff. And share stuff. Well, I don't really write, but I just visit with them. I think about writing. I'm not really that good at writing."
Lady 1: "That's nice. Sounds fun. So where can I find your writing?"
Lady 2: "Um, oh, well. Um, well, there's not too much. Just the poem. There are three places, but the websites are long. You probably won't remember."
Lady 1: "Can I just Google your name? Or the name of the poem? What's the title of the poem?"
Lady 2: "Oh, dear. No, it was over six years ago. One of the websites is, um, well, I think...www.blahbeddyblah.blah.com..."
Lady 1: (after three deep breaths, a confused look then a relieved look when the instructor came into the class): "Well, it was nice seeing you again. Have fun at your...writing...meeting. Have a good class."
===
It took everything in me not to get up, shake the "writer" and plop her down on her purple mat. Two things about the interaction really hacked me off:
1) If you're a writer, don't be a wimp about it. No "oh, well, um..er...and I...but I'm not good enough because I'm not published...blahblahblah" crap. This might sound a little harsh, and even judgmental, but I feel justified in saying it because I was once in that very position.
I loved writing, wrote a number of short stories and six novels that were just not meant to be published. I hardly ever admitted in public that I was a writer, and when I did, I beat around the bush. Part a lack of confidence, part a mental equation of publishing=true writer, I wanted validation from someone else that I was a writer. Once I realized that no one was going to pat my hand and say, "Oh, honey, you *ARE* a real writer!", I got the courage, in small increments, to admit without remorse that I was a writer. It eventually led to my first national feature, just from confidently sharing that I was a writer.
I told my son about the two ladies and he couldn't understand why I wanted to shake the lady right out of Hero's pose. I likened it to this example: No one else underestimates themselves like writers (especially unpubs). I have never met a lawyer or teacher or retail sales clerk who introduces themselves like: "Oh, I sorta do law and represent some people but I haven't won a million dollar case yet, so I'm just dabbling in law," or, "Um, I, uh, well, I teach kids, but they're not really that great and don't have college scholarships or anything," or, "I like to sell stuff, but just little things like perfume and handbags. I'm not really a salesperson because I haven't sold a ten-carat diamond bracelet yet."
Hello?! If you're a writer, you're a writer. Practice in front of a mirror if you have to, or with a friend. Don't be the Cowardly Lion of writing.
Oh, and the second thought: (lol)
2) On the other hand, if Miss Writing Example isn't writing, only wrote one poem six years ago and hangs out with other writers for fun but doesn't really write anything, either get your butt writing or quit calling yourself a writer. Yes, harsh again, but it hacks me off to no end that "being a writer" is more about "hanging out with writers" than "writing". I call myself a baker, and, if you ask anyone around me, I'm always baking something. Cookies, bread, currently trying to win a cookbook contest with my secret peanut butter dessert...I don't call myself a baker because I read cookbooks or hang out at a bakery and admire the croissant flakes.
Now, I know I have a different (read: more opinionated opinion) on this issue than other writers. I know because it's come up different times in different groups of writers, and it just makes me mad. I don't know why, it shouldn't be my concern if someone says they're a writer but they don't write. (That's like me claiming to be a math wiz when the last math problem I finished (incorrectly, most likely) was in geometry class in 1987. ) It just does.
So the bottom line is this: If you're a writer, admit you're a writer. If you're a wimp, don't admit that you're a wimp by admitting that you're a writer when you don't write. Thank you!
Posted by Beth at Sunday, June 22, 2008
Thursday, June 19, 2008
Freelance-Zone.com: Another Great Writing Blog (and not just because they mentioned me)
Ok, you're right. I should be working on the final edit for the business article...since it is due tomorrow. All I have to do is clean it up, so no worries. Geez. You're as bad as mom. (Ok, maybe not *that* bad...) (I'm kidding, mom!)
Instead, I'm running amok online, engrossed in my favorite internet past time: reading the blogs of other writers. Lord, we're all so much alike it's almost scary. (Actually, it's quite comforting).
You'll never guess what I found! A post about me and my writing blog! Crazy, huh? Joe Wallace, the intrepid author of the Freelance-Zone.com blog not only mentioned Writer In Progress, but gave us quite a nice post. I sure wasn't expecting that. In fact, when I pulled down his recent posts in my Firefox reader and saw "Writer In Progress" I worried someone was stealing my identity ...lol.
Anyways, the post gave me an unexpected boost. I have admired Joe's blog for some time, always look forward to reading and know that I'll find something new that will either have me thinking or acting toward a writing goal. I really like his take on all things writing and editing, and especially admire his ability to call things as he sees is instead of trying to sound all nice (it's a curse I cannot break. I wish I could bring myself to use "idiots", "WTF", "bastards" and "dolts" in my writing observations). Maybe I can work on that....
You really should stop over and check out his recent "Confessions of an Editor" series to understand just how ridiculous (unprofessional and wannabe) writers can be. Don't worry, we won't expect you back in time for dinner. Wander the halls and poke around the corners--I guarantee you'll find all kinds of great stuff over there.
Posted by Beth at Thursday, June 19, 2008
Labels:
Great Writer Sites
